iamserio.us

There are so many things I want to learn how to do that seem so daunting and complex. Of course, if I were to view my current self as a young 16 year-old I’d say to myself “Wow, I’m really smart! Look at all of this stuff I can do when I’m 21!” because the things that I know how to do now (HTML, CSS, Litestep, etc.) were such foreign concepts to me back in those days that they seemed nigh impossible to fathom.

Most things aren’t as complex as they first appear and once you strip away the details and look at the skeleton of a process or system, it’s fairly simple to wrap your mind around how they work. The trick to doing this is conceptualization.

Conceptualizing a complex idea is sometimes harder to do than it should be. As humans, we tend to overcomplicate things and look too closely at the finer details thinking that we have to understand every little thing before we can begin to grasp the big picture. Really, the situation is exactly the opposite.

The next time you’re struggling to understand a new idea, strip away all the details. Look at the concept behind what you’re doing. Stop trying to figure out how to get something to work for a specific task and take a look at why you’re trying to get it to do that and what consequences this task has on the large scheme of things. If you can understand the concept of something, all of the details will fill themselves in and make a lot more sense.

Let’s take Litestep for example since I’m pretty good at explaining the concept with an apt analogy. Litestep, as an executable, is simply the brain of the shell. It can’t do anything on its own but it can handle the bang commands and scripts which are the thoughts. So what’s a brain without a body? Nothing.

That’s where the modules come in. Litestep is the brain and the modules (such as xlabel, rainmeter, lsxcommand, and taskbar3) are the appendages that get stuff done. A Litestep theme’s scripts (thoughts) are processed by the Litestep.exe (brain) and whatever changes made are reflected by the modules (appendages).

It’s this sort of conceptualization that makes it hundreds of times easier to understand how Litestep works. When you look at it this way, it’s so much easier to locate the problem when something breaks or figure out how to add a feature to a theme.

The point of this is to encourage people to stop looking at everything with a finetooth comb and step back. Forget all the details and look at the big picture. It will make understanding complex systems so much easier and you will actually learn how to learn if you can imagine that. Just give it a shot.

Context gets lost over time. People forget why certain things were so important either because they weren’t alive or no one really explained it to them.

I have a friend who thinks The Beatles are the most overrated band in music history. He doesn’t like any of their music and doesn’t understand why they have such a following. The fact that he doesn’t like their music is a reasonable claim but the key to understanding why The Beatles are as popular as they are is to look at the context of their albums; to see why people were so blown away.

When Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band came out in June of 1967 there was nothing like it. Previous to this album there had been nothing else that ventured this far into the realm of pop music and tested what it could really sound like. If this album were released today, Pitchfork would write it off as a pop album worth a listen but nothing stellar or groundbreaking. The thing to remember is that this album came out nearly forty years ago. It set the standard for what an experimental pop record could sound like without alienating the listener. Without this album, there would be no Franz Ferdinand, The Strokes, or Radiohead. Well, ok, that’s arguable but it’s safe to say the face of music would be vastly different than it is today if it were not for The Beatles and albums like Sgt. Pepper’s and Revolver

A second example of lost context is the work of Albert Einstein and the theory of general relativity. You can see his famous equation E=mc² all over the place. In office supply advertisements, commercials on tv, television shows… it’s everywhere and has been for years. I’d wager that E=mc² is the most recognizable mathematical equation in regards to authorship and it probably always will be.

Parellel to this, I’d wager that most people who can point out that E=mc² is Albert Einstein’s equation wouldn’t be able to tell you what the variables stand for or what the equation represents as a whole. The meaning of the equation has been lost and Albert Einstein is nothing more than a pop culture icon to be put on t-shirts and coffee mugs.

See, Einstein’s postulation of the theory of general relativity overturned about six hundred years of Newtonian physics. Not only that, Einstein basically said “I have this theory that explains the nature of the entire galaxy, nay, the universe and you know what? We can test it during this next eclipse and see if I’m right!” (say it in a German accent, it’s more fun that way).

Einstein was, in fact, right and is the most famous physicist since Newton himself. It’s important to remember the context, though. It’s important to realize that while we take the notion of relativity for granted, at the time it was a very radical and new idea.

I guess what I’m saying is; try and encapsulate anything you examine in its own context, especially when that event/place/person/thing exists in a certain time period that you yourself may not have experienced. Context is the key to understanding the world and why things are the way they are.

Well, context and conceptualization. Read my next entry for my thoughts on conceptualization.

Welcome to yet another sure to be short-lived website by Brian Connolly. I’ll be using this site to write about things that interest me that will also interest you. I’d like to try and follow the three rules that Andy outlined on his site about three years ago, but maybe a little less strict.

1) No mind-numbing journals about what I did today.

2) No re-hashed content.

3) No boring content.

Let’s see how this experiment turns out.